| 42 | 0 | 24 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探究康妇炎胶囊联合抗生素治疗盆腔炎性疾病(PID)盆腔痛的临床相关,分析对患者中医证候积分和炎症细胞因子水平的影响。方法 选取2022年10月—2025年2月在杭州市临平区妇幼保健院就诊的180例PID盆腔痛患者,随机分为对照组、短期药物组及长期药物组,每组各60例。对照组给予头孢地尼胶囊治疗,短期药物组在对照组基础上加用康妇炎胶囊28 d,长期药物组在对照组基础上加用康妇炎胶囊56 d。比较3组临床疗效、中医证候积分、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)水平及不良反应发生率。结果 治疗后,短期药物组(90.00%)和长期药物组(95.00%)总有效率均高于对照组(75.00%),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=4.675、9.412,均P<0.05),但短期药物组和长期药物组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.081,P>0.05)。短期药物组主症评分[(3.24±0.89)分]、次症评分[(3.12±0.84)分]均低于对照组[主症(5.37±1.16)分、次症(4.78±0.95)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=11.280、10.140,均P<0.05);长期药物组主症评分[(3.07±0.72)分]、次症评分[(2.74±0.71)分]均低于对照组(t=13.050、13.320,均P<0.05),且长期药物组次症评分低于短期药物组(t=2.676,P<0.05)。短期药物组的CRP水平[(5.12±1.86)mg/L]、IL-6水平[(14.42±3.75)pg/ml]低于对照组[CRP(8.25±2.41)mg/L、IL-6(20.16±4.38)pg/ml](t=7.964、7.711,均P<0.05),IL-10水平[(29.84±5.16)pg/ml]高于对照组[(24.35±4.52)pg/ml],差异有统计学意义(t=6.199,P<0.05);长期药物组的CRP水平[(3.85±1.24)mg/L]、IL-6水平[(10.26±3.02)pg/ml]均低于对照组(t=12.580、14.410,均P<0.05),IL-10水平[(33.74±5.86)pg/ml]高于对照组(t=9.828,P<0.05);且长期药物组的CRP、IL-6水平均低于短期药物组(t=4.401、6.692,均P<0.05),IL-10水平高于短期药物组(t=3.869,P<0.05)。对照组、短期药物组及长期药物组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.084,P>0.05)。结论 康妇炎胶囊联合抗生素治疗PID盆腔痛疗效显著,可提高总有效率、降低中医证候积分、改善炎症细胞因子水平,且安全性良好;其中联合治疗56 d在炎症细胞因子调节方面更具优势。
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of Kangfuyan Capsules combined with antibiotics in the treatment of pelvic pain caused by pelvic inflammatory disease(PID) and analyze their impacts on TCM syndrome scores and inflammatory cytokine levels in patients.Methods A total of 180 PID patients with pelvic pain who were admitted to Hangzhou Linping District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from October 2022 to February 2025 were randomly divided into a control group, short-term drug group, and long-term drug group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group was treated with Cefdinir Capsules; short-term drug group was given Kangfuyan Capsules for 28 days on the basis of the control group's treatment; long-term drug group was administered Kangfuyan Capsules for 56 days in combination with the control group's regimen. The clinical efficacy, TCM syndrome scores, C-reactive protein(CRP), interleukin-6(IL-6), interleukin-10(IL-10) levels, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared among the three groups. Results After treatment, the total effective rates of short-term drug group(90.00%) and long-term drug group(95.00%) were significantly higher than that of the control group(75.00%), with statistical differences(χ2=4.675, 9.412, all P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the total effective rate between short-term drug group and long-term drug group(χ2=1.081, P>0.05).The scores of major TCM syndromes [(3.24±0.89) points] and minor TCM syndromes [(3.12±0.84) points] in short-term drug group were significantly lower than those in the control group [(5.37±1.16) points and(4.78±0.95) points, respectively], with statistical differences(t=11.280, 10.140, all P<0.05).The scores of major TCM syndromes [(3.07±0.72) points] and minor TCM syndromes [(2.74±0.71) points] in long-term drug group were also significantly lower than those in the control group(t=13.050, 13.320, all P<0.05), and the score of minor TCM syndromes in long-term drug group was lower than that in short-term drug group(t=2.676, P<0.05).The levels of CRP [(5.12±1.86) mg/L] and IL-6 [(14.42±3.75) pg/ml] in short-term drug group were significantly lower than those in the control group [CRP(8.25±2.41) mg/L, IL-6(20.16±4.38) pg/ml], with statistical differences(t=7.964, 7.711, all P<0.05), while the level of IL-10 [(29.84±5.16) pg/ml] was significantly higher than that in the control group [(24.35±4.52) pg/ml](t=6.199, P<0.05).The levels of CRP [(3.85±1.24) mg/L] and IL-6 [(10.26±3.02) pg/ml] in long-term drug group were significantly lower than those in the control group(t=12.580, 14.410, all P<0.05), and the level of IL-10 [(33.74±5.86) pg/ml] was significantly higher than that in the control group(t=9.828, P<0.05).Furthermore, the levels of CRP and IL-6 in long-term drug group were significantly lower than those in short-term drug group(t=4.401, 6.692, all P<0.05), and the level of IL-10 was significantly higher than that in short-term drug group(t=3.869, P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the control group(8.33%), short-term drug group(5.00%), and long-term drug group(10.00%)(χ2=1.084, P>0.05).Conclusion Kangfuyan Capsules combined with antibiotics have a significant efficacy in the treatment of PID-induced pelvic pain. They can improve the total effective rate, reduce TCM syndrome scores, and optimize inflammatory cytokine levels with good safety. Among them, the 56 days combined treatment is more advantageous in regulating inflammatory cytokines.
[1] 曾璐璐,曾俏俏,张畹晴,等.盆腔炎性疾病的发病机制及联合治疗研究进展[J].国际妇产科学杂志,2025,52(3):252-256,279.
[2] 徐凤梅.壮医匹绸方藤饮治疗盆腔炎性疾病后遗症慢性盆腔痛的临床研究[D].南宁:广西中医药大学,2023.
[3] Savaris RF,Fuhrich DG,Maissiat J,et al.Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2020,8(8):CD010285.
[4] 乔延盈,刘丽.中医治疗盆腔炎性疾病后遗症进展及作用机制概述[J].中医药临床杂志,2024,36(12):2425-2430.
[5] 樊亚东,张晓雨,王惠津.康妇炎胶囊治疗盆腔炎性疾病的网络药理学机制分析[J].天津药学,2021,33(3):31-35.
[6] 赵新,刘生元.康妇炎胶囊联合甲硝唑对湿热蕴结型慢性盆腔炎患者炎症因子T细胞亚群及生活质量的影响[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(24):3346-3349.
[7] 谢幸.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:257.
[8] 张玉珍.中医妇科学[M].北京:中国中医药出版,2017:320-322.
[9] Chiarotto A,Maxwell LJ,Ostelo RW,et al.Measurement properties of visual analogue scale,numeric rating scale,and pain severity subscale of the brief pain inventory in patients with low back pain:a systematic review[J].J Pain,2019,20(3):245-263.
[10] 王梦瑶,罗廷,魏兆莲.慢性盆腔炎中西医结合治疗进展[J].安徽医科大学学报,2025,60(3):584-588.
[11] 戎飞玲,廖薇,何静玲.盆腔炎性疾病后遗慢性盆腔痛患者中医体质与经络检测值相关性分析[J].山东中医杂志,2022,41(8):859-864.
[12] 许文秋.中药内外合治湿热瘀阻型盆腔炎性疾病后遗症(慢性盆腔痛)的临床研究[D].南宁:广西中医药大学,2022.
[13] 顾海娜,谢琼艳,李书艳,等.康妇炎胶囊对支原体属感染慢性盆腔炎血清炎症因子及盆腔血流动力学的影响[J].中华中医药学刊,2023,41(2):201-204.
[14] Wiesenfeld HC,Meyn LA,Darville T,et al.A randomized controlled trial of ceftriaxone and doxycycline,with or without metronidazole,for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease[J].Clin Infect Dis,2021,72(7):1181-1189.
[15] 张艳,赵广峰,孙修丽,等.妇炎净胶囊联合头孢曲松钠治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床效果[J].中国医药,2024,19(9):1379-1382.
[16] 魏绍斌.中医药防治盆腔炎性疾病及其后遗症的思路、方法及长期管理策略[J].北京中医药大学学报,2023,46(9):1204-1212.
[17] 徐萍,赵艳,吴嫣,等.康妇炎胶囊与抗生素联合治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效及对患者不良情绪、生活质量及血清炎性因子水平的影响[J].贵州医药,2020,44(7):1131-1132.
[18] 高守阳,田秀娟,王俊容,等.康妇炎胶囊联合五水头孢唑林钠对慢性盆腔炎血液流变学及炎性细胞因子的影响[J].疑难病杂志,2016,15(11):1166-1169.
[19] Mao N,Xu Z,Su J,et al.Bioequivalence of cefdinir dispersible tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions:a single-centred,randomized,open,single-dose,two-preparation,two-cycle,two-sequence,double-crossover trial[J].Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol,2025,398(6):6821-6829.
[20] Liu ZH,Jin Z,Zhao H,et al.Effect and Safety of Kangfuyan Capsules for relieving chronic pelvic pain:a multicenter,randomized,controlled,double-blind,parallel-group clinical trial[J].Chin J Integr Med,2021,27(12):883-890.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2026.06.004
中图分类号:R711.33
引用信息:
[1]史英英,李青青.康妇炎胶囊联合抗生素治疗盆腔炎性疾病盆腔痛的临床效果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2026,41(06):985-990.DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2026.06.004.
基金信息:
浙江省杭州市生物医药和健康产业发展扶持科技专项项目(2022WJC092)
2026-03-15
2026-03-15